Experimental validation confirmed that 9 sequences out of 22 (40% hit rate) exhibited activity against at least one of the five substrates tested, demonstrating our approach’s ability to identify functional biocatalysts.
For both generics and pharmaceutical companies, speed to market is a critical driver of commercial success. While biocatalysis offers a superior path to synthesizing complex chiral APIs, the traditional enzyme discovery process —reliant on extensive, resource-intensive high-throughput screening (HTS)— creates a significant bottleneck. This time barrier often prevents the adoption of optimal enzymatic solutions.
Faced with this challenge, researchers from Boehringer Ingelheim, Christian-Albrechts University of Kiel, Gecco Biotech and Zymvol sought a faster, more efficient path to identify a specific ketoreductase (KRED) for a key pharmaceutical building block.

Target kinetic resolution reaction.
Instead of embarking on an experimental campaign, the consortium partnered with Zymvol to leverage its BioMatchMaker® platform. The goal was to bypass discovery bottlenecks and deliver a small set of high-potential enzymes ready for immediate validation.
Zymvol’s in silico process involved:

The chain A of Tcalid SDR showing two observed conformations of NADP with a zoomed in view of the encounter complex.

Conversion and ee% of selected enzyme hits.
The top-performing enzyme, Tcalid SDR (Enzyme 15), delivered an outstanding combination of activity and e.e.
Performance Highlights50%
Hit rate
From 16 computationally-selected candidates, half were confirmed as active enzymes, drastically reducing lab validation costs and effort.
63%
Conversion
Within a 30-min reaction, the top-performing enzyme showcased its effectiveness in turning the starting material into the desired product.
100%
Enantiomeric excess
Within a 30-min reaction, the top-performing enzyme delivered perfect stereoselectivity by producing only the single, desired stereoisomer.
|
|
This Success Story summarizes the results presented in a peer-reviewed research paper. In collaboration with: |